[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Resources start serial, not parralel
Ulrich Windl
Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de
Wed Dec 16 14:29:42 UTC 2015
>>> Michal Koutný <mkoutny at suse.com> schrieb am 16.12.2015 um 13:43 in
Nachricht
<56715C56.60409 at suse.com>:
> Hi Oleg.
>
> On 12/16/2015 11:31 AM, Oleg Ilyin wrote:
>> So, main point of my issue is jobs = 1
>>
>> Please, does it possibly to increase number of jobs through throttle
high?
> The parameter you are looking for is 'load_threshold' cluster property.
> It defaults to 0.8, which is IMO quite reasonable. So if you didn't
Hmm,
I'd like to object strongly (as I pointed out in a former message): Linux adds
the load of all CPUs, adn does not average them, AND I/O waits add to the load
(as opposed to HP-UX for example). Thus on a 2*6 Core Intel machin (24 logical
CPUs) a load of 10 means some CPUs are bored. Recently we had a load of 60, and
nobody noticed.
This means such a system is more or less idle:
---
top - 15:27:07 up 4 days, 19:07, 5 users, load average: 2.45, 2.73, 2.37
Tasks: 1017 total, 4 running, 1013 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 11.5%us, 2.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 81.1%id, 4.6%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.7%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 129058M total, 120777M used, 8281M free, 1319M buffers
Swap: 20465M total, 166M used, 20299M free, 93065M cached
---
Maybe the default should be 0.8 times the number of logical CPUs, considering
"hot plug CPUs" that work nicely already (e.g. in Xen PVMs).
> change it, I'd suggest rather looking how the actual load could be
> reduced (pinpoint and optimize the consumers or more performant HW),
> instead of "forcing" Pacemaker to intentionally overload the node.
Dropping useless load and improving efficiency is the best solutions of all
;-)
Regards,
Ulrich
More information about the Users
mailing list