[ClusterLabs] design of a two-node cluster
Lentes, Bernd
bernd.lentes at helmholtz-muenchen.de
Wed Dec 16 00:35:16 CET 2015
Digimer wrote:
> To prevent a dual fence, where both nodes fence each other when
> communication between the nodes fail but the nodes are otherwise
> healthy, you need to set a fence delay against one of the nodes. So when
> this happens, if the delay is on node 1, this will happen;
>
> Node 1 looks up how to fence node 2, sees no delay and fences
> immediately. Node 2 looks up how to fence node 1, sees a delay and
> pauses. Node 2 will be dead long before the delay expires, ensuring that
> node 2 always loses in such a case. If you have VMs on both nodes, then
> no matter which node the delay is on, some servers will be interrupted.
>
Ok. The setp for the ressources is clear now.
What is about fencing, quorum, STONITH ?
Are there other possibilities than the mentioned fence delay ?
When the interconnect between the nodes goes down, i have a split brain.
In every node i have two eth's which will be combined to a bond.
I have two possibilities to fence, HP ILO and an APC Power switch which is configurable over network.
What i read already is that in a two-node cluster i have to diable quorum.
What is about a quorum disk ? I also read about "tiebrakers" or that STONITH is magically able to chosse the right
node to fence (i can't believe that).
Bernd
Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen
Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH)
Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1
85764 Neuherberg
www.helmholtz-muenchen.de
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzende: MinDir'in Baerbel Brumme-Bothe
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Prof. Dr. Guenther Wess, Dr. Nikolaus Blum, Dr. Alfons Enhsen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 6466
USt-IdNr: DE 129521671
More information about the Users
mailing list