[ClusterLabs] [Question] About deletion of "SysVStartPriority".

renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
Thu Aug 6 08:29:35 UTC 2015


Hi Jan,

Thank you for comments.


>> When we use Pacemaker1.1.12, does it have a problem to delete 
> "SysVStartPriority=99"?
>> Or must we not delete it when use Pacemaker1.1.12 and Pacemaker1.1.13?
>> Or is it necessary to judge it by a version of systemd of the OS, and to 
> set it?
> 
> It was a leftover from times systemd took that value into account
> (definitely not the case with systemd-218+), and yes, systemd version
> is the only deciding factor whether it makes sense to state the
> parameter in the unit file.  I wouldn't expect this change will
> cause any issue regardless since the order at the startup/shutdown
> is pretty clear anyway (After/Requires).


We delete "SysVStartPriority=99" in Pacemaker1.1.12 and move it.
If a problem occurs, I report it.

Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauch.



----- Original Message -----
> From: Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com>
> To: users at clusterlabs.org
> Cc: 
> Date: 2015/8/6, Thu 16:13
> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] [Question] About deletion of "SysVStartPriority".
> 
> On 06/08/15 15:42 +0900, renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>>  We have a question for the next correction.
>>   * 
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/a97c28d75347aa7be76092aa22459f0f56a220ff
>> 
>>  We understand it that this obeyed a correction of systemd.
>> 
>> 
>>  In Pacemaker1.1.13, "SysVStartPriority=99" is set.
>>  Pacemaker1.1.12 is set, too.
>> 
>> 
>>  When we use Pacemaker1.1.12, does it have a problem to delete 
> "SysVStartPriority=99"?
>>  Or must we not delete it when use Pacemaker1.1.12 and Pacemaker1.1.13?
>>  Or is it necessary to judge it by a version of systemd of the OS, and to 
> set it?
> 
> It was a leftover from times systemd took that value into account
> (definitely not the case with systemd-218+), and yes, systemd version
> is the only deciding factor whether it makes sense to state the
> parameter in the unit file.  I wouldn't expect this change will
> cause any issue regardless since the order at the startup/shutdown
> is pretty clear anyway (After/Requires).
> 
> So if you want, just go for it (and let us know in case of troubles).
> After all, unit files are there to be tweaked by keen sysadmins like
> you via overrides in /etc/systemd/user :-)
> 
> -- 
> Jan (Poki)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> 




More information about the Users mailing list