[Pacemaker] Suggestions for managing HA of containers from within a Pacemaker container?

Digimer lists at alteeve.ca
Thu Feb 26 02:54:14 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 25/02/15 09:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> 
>> On 26 Feb 2015, at 8:51 am, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote:
>> 
> On 25/02/15 04:45 PM, David Vossel wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> Pacemaker as a scheduler in Mesos or Kubernates does sound
>>>>> like a very interesting idea. Packaging corosync into super
>>>>> privileged containers still doesn't make too much sense to
>>>>> me. What's the reason in isolating something and then
>>>>> giving it all permissions on a host machine?
>>>> 
>>>> because soon everything will run in containers. Take a look
>>>> at rhel atomic and the stuff coreos is doing. The only way
>>>> pacemaker will exist on those distributions is if it lives in
>>>> a super privileged container.
> 
> If I can respectfully disagree, or at least provide a different
> opinion;
> 
> I'm old enough to have seen many supposed "game changers" come and
> go. Maybe containers will be different, but to simply assume so at
> this stage and to base the future development of HA software on
> that assumption seems ... risky.
> 
> I think there is an argument for supporting containers, sure, but
> not to base plans on the assumption that they will become the
> be-all and end-all.
> 
>> Key phrase: "on these distros". David's not suggesting everyone
>> run Pacemaker like this, only people that have bought into
>> distros that drank the container brand cool-aid (probably out of
>> a container!).

Ah, ok then. :)

- -- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=GHxp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list