[Pacemaker] Loosing corosync communication clusterwide

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Wed Nov 12 01:29:18 EST 2014

> On 11 Nov 2014, at 10:12 pm, Daniel Dehennin <daniel.dehennin at baby-gnu.org> wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> writes:
> [...]
>>> I have fencing configured and working, modulo fencing VMs on dead host[1].
>> Are you saying that the host and the VMs running inside it are both part of the same cluster?
> Yes, one of the VM needs to access the GFS2 filesystem like the nodes,
> the other VM is a quorum node (standby=on).

That sounds like a recipe for disaster to be honest.
If you want VM's to be part of a cluster, it would be advisable to have their host(s) be in a different one.

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list