[Pacemaker] Priority Resource Option

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Fri May 2 00:59:14 EDT 2014

On 23 Apr 2014, at 7:01 pm, Robert Dahlem <Robert.Dahlem at gmx.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> the documentation states: "If not all resources can be active, the
> cluster will stop lower priority resources in order to keep higher
> priority ones active."
> What I did not find yet: what causes a resource not to be able to become
> active? I think I am looking for some kind of antagonist to "priority".

Imagine 4 resources, none of which may run together, and only 3 active nodes :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20140502/63a737aa/attachment-0002.sig>

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list