[Pacemaker] hangs pending
Andrew Beekhof
andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Mar 18 23:26:19 UTC 2014
On 19 Mar 2014, at 6:19 am, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>
>
> 12.03.2014, 02:53, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>> Sorry for the delay, sometimes it takes a while to rebuild the necessary context
>
> I'm sorry too for the answer delay.
> I switched to using "upstart" for initializing corosync and pacemaker (with respawn).
> Now the behavior of the system has changed and it suits me. (yet :) )
> I must kill crmd/lrmd in infinite loop, then STONITH shoot.
> Else very fast respawn and do nothing.
>
> Of course, I still found a other way to hang the system.
> This requires only one idiot.
> 1. He decides to update pacemaker (and/or erase incomprehensible service).
> 2. Then kills the process corosync or simply reboot the server.
> Everything! This node will remain hang in "pending".
While trying to shutdown?
Our spec files shut pacemaker down prior to upgrades FWIW.
> And the worst thing ... if at least one node hangs in "pending" - does not work promote/demote and other manage a resources.
>
> Yes, there is one oddity with long inclusion of some resources, but IMHO it is not very critical.
> I try correct a later, now I write documentation for project.
>
>
>
>>
>> On 5 Mar 2014, at 4:42 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>
>>> 05.03.2014, 04:04, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>> On 25 Feb 2014, at 8:30 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>> 21.02.2014, 12:04, "Andrey Groshev" <greenx at yandex.ru>:
>>>>>> 21.02.2014, 05:53, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>> On 19 Feb 2014, at 7:53 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 19.02.2014, 09:49, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>> On 19 Feb 2014, at 4:18 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 19.02.2014, 09:08, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Feb 2014, at 4:00 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 19.02.2014, 06:48, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb 2014, at 11:05 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, ALL and Andrew!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today is a good day - I killed a lot, and a lot of shooting at me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In general - I am happy (almost like an elephant) :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except resources on the node are important to me eight processes: corosync,pacemakerd,cib,stonithd,lrmd,attrd,pengine,crmd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I killed them with different signals (4,6,11 and even 9).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Behavior does not depend of number signal - it's good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If STONITH send reboot to the node - it rebooted and rejoined the cluster - too it's good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But the behavior is different from killing various demons.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Turned four groups:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. corosync,cib - STONITH work 100%.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kill via any signals - call STONITH and reboot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. lrmd,crmd - strange behavior STONITH.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sometimes called STONITH - and the corresponding reaction.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sometimes restart daemon and restart resources with large delay MS:pgsql.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One time after restart crmd - pgsql don't restart.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. stonithd,attrd,pengine - not need STONITH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This daemons simple restart, resources - stay running.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. pacemakerd - nothing happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And then I can kill any process of the third group. They do not restart.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Generaly don't touch corosync,cib and maybe lrmd,crmd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think about this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The main question of this topic - we decided.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But this varied behavior - another big problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Forgоt logs http://send2me.ru/pcmk-Tue-18-Feb-2014.tar.bz2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which of the various conditions above do the logs cover?
>>>>>>>>>>>> All various in day.
>>>>>>>>>>> Are you trying to torture me?
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you give me a rough idea what happened when?
>>>>>>>>>> No, there is 8 processes on the 4th signal and repeats the experiments with unknown outcome :)
>>>>>>>>>> Easier to conduct new experiments and individual new logs .
>>>>>>>>>> Which variant is more interesting?
>>>>>>>>> The long delay in restarting pgsql.
>>>>>>>>> Everything else seems correct.
>>>>>>>> He even don't tried start pgsql.
>>>>>>>> In Logs tree the tests.
>>>>>>>> kill -s4 lrmd pid.
>>>>>>>> 1. STONITH
>>>>>>>> 2. STONITH
>>>>>>>> 3. hangs
>>>>>>> Its waiting on a value for default_ping_set
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems we're calling monitor for pingCheck but for some reason its not performing an update:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # grep 2632.*lrmd.*pingCheck /Users/beekhof/Downloads/pcmk-Wed-19-Feb-2014/dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru/corosync.log
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:49:58 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: info: process_lrmd_get_rsc_info: Resource 'pingCheck' not found (3 active resources)
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:49:58 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: info: process_lrmd_get_rsc_info: Resource 'pingCheck:3' not found (3 active resources)
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:49:58 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: info: process_lrmd_rsc_register: Added 'pingCheck' to the rsc list (4 active resources)
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:49:58 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: log_execute: executing - rsc:pingCheck action:monitor call_id:19
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:50:00 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: operation_finished: pingCheck_monitor_0:2658 - exited with rc=0
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:50:00 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: operation_finished: pingCheck_monitor_0:2658:stderr [ -- empty -- ]
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:50:00 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: operation_finished: pingCheck_monitor_0:2658:stdout [ -- empty -- ]
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:50:00 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: log_finished: finished - rsc:pingCheck action:monitor call_id:19 pid:2658 exit-code:0 exec-time:2039ms queue-time:0ms
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:50:00 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: log_execute: executing - rsc:pingCheck action:monitor call_id:20
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:50:02 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: operation_finished: pingCheck_monitor_10000:2816 - exited with rc=0
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:50:02 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: operation_finished: pingCheck_monitor_10000:2816:stderr [ -- empty -- ]
>>>>>>> Feb 19 10:50:02 [2632] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: operation_finished: pingCheck_monitor_10000:2816:stdout [ -- empty -- ]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you add:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> export OCF_TRACE_RA=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to the top of the ping agent and retest?
>>>>>> Today the fourth time worked.
>>>>>> I even doubted if the difference is how to kill (kill -s 4 pid or pkill -4 lrmd)
>>>>>> Logs http://send2me.ru/pcmk-Fri-21-Feb-2014.tar.bz2
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> You haven't watched it?
>>>> Not yet. I've been hitting ACLs with a large hammer.
>>>> Where are we up to with this? Do I disregard this one and look at the most recent email?
>>> Hi.
>>> No. These are two different cases.
>>> * When after kill lrmd resources don't start.
>>> This http://send2me.ru/pcmk-Fri-21-Feb-2014.tar.bz2
>>
>> Grumble, the logs are still useless...
>>
>> ./dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru/corosync.log:Feb 21 11:00:10 [26298] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: operation_finished: pingCheck_start_0:26456 - exited with rc=0
>> ./dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru/corosync.log:Feb 21 11:00:10 [26298] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: operation_finished: pingCheck_start_0:26456:stderr [ -- empty -- ]
>> ./dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru/corosync.log:Feb 21 11:00:10 [26298] dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru lrmd: debug: operation_finished: pingCheck_start_0:26456:stdout [ -- empty -- ]
>>
>> Can you just add the following to the top of the resource agent?
>>
>> set -x
>>
>>> * When standby a entrie cluster (all nodes standby).
>>> Second node - hangs pending.
>>> But last rebuild rpm - not confirmed the problem.
>>
>> Ok, so potentially this is fixed with the latest git?
>>
>>> Therefore, this problem can be considered as long as not a problem.
>>> http://send2me.ru/pcmk-04-Mar-2014-2.tar.bz2
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>
>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>
>> ,
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20140319/bf50bbb7/attachment-0004.sig>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list