[Pacemaker] Colocation set options (pcs syntax)
Asgaroth
lists at blueface.com
Fri Feb 28 08:32:32 UTC 2014
> pcs constraint colocation set fs_ldap-clone sftp01-vip ldap1
> sequential=true
>
> Let me know if this does or doesn't work for you.
I have been testing this now for a couple days and I think I must be
doing something wrong, firstly though, the command itself completes
successfully:
# pcs constraint show --full
<snip>
Resource Sets:
set fs_ldap-clone sftp01-vip ldap1 sequential=true (id:pcs_rsc_set)
(id:pcs_rsc_colocation)
However, if I try to test it by moving, for example, the "sftp01-vip"
resource group to another node, then is does not move the ldap1 service
with it, example below:
Cluster state before resource move:
http://pastebin.com/a13ZhyRq
Then I do "pcs resource move sftp01-vip bfievsftp02", which moves
resources to the node (except the associated ldap1 service)
Cluster state after the move:
http://pastebin.com/BSyTBEhX
Full constraint list:
http://pastebin.com/ng6m4C1Z
Here is what I am trying to achieve:
[1] The sftp0[1-3]-vip groups each have a prefered node
(sftp01-vip=node1, sftp02-vip=node2, sftp03-vip=node3
[2] The sftp0[1-3] lsb resources are colocated with sftp0[1-3]-vip groups
[3] The ldap[1-3] lsb resources are colocated with sftp0[1-3]-vip groups
I managed to achieve the above using logic contraints as listed in the
constraint output, however, the sftp0[1-3] and ldap[1-3] lsb resources
also depend on fs_cdr-clone and fs_ldap-clone respectively, being available.
I thought I would be able to achive that file system dependancy using
the colocation set, but this does not seem to work the way I am
expecting it to, or, quite possibly, my logic may be slightly(largely)
off :)
How would I ensure, that in the case of a node failure, the vip group
moves to a node which has the fs_cdr and fs_ldap file system resources
available? If I can do that, then, I can keep the colocation rule for
the sftp/ldap service with the vip group. Or am I thinking about this
the wrong way around?
Any tips/suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list