[Pacemaker] 1.1.12: route_ais_message: Sending message to local.stonith-ng failed: ipc delivery failed (rc=-2)

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Fri Aug 1 00:04:23 EDT 2014


On 1 Aug 2014, at 7:47 am, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> 
> On 31 Jul 2014, at 4:46 pm, Cédric Dufour - Idiap Research Institute <cedric.dufour at idiap.ch> wrote:
> 
>> On 31/07/14 00:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On 31 Jul 2014, at 2:48 am, Cédric Dufour - Idiap Research Institute <cedric.dufour at idiap.ch> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> After packaging pacemaker 1.1.12 for Debian/Wheezy (along corosync 1.4.6 and libqb 0.17.0), I have successfully initialized a new cluster.
>>>> 
>>>> Back to a very simple test cluster, the only problem I have is with fencing, which fails altogether with "route_ais_message: Sending message to local.stonith-ng failed: ipc delivery failed (rc=-2)" messages:
>>>> 
>>>> root at bc1hs22a01:~ # tail /var/log/corosync.rsyslog
>>>> Jul 30 18:41:41 bc1hs22a01 stonith_admin[5411]:   notice: crm_log_args: Invoked: stonith_admin -F bc1hs22a02
>>>> Jul 30 18:41:41 bc1hs22a01 stonithd[4754]:   notice: handle_request: Client stonith_admin.5411.fe1388ed wants to fence (off) 'bc1hs22a02' with device '(any)'
>>>> Jul 30 18:41:41 bc1hs22a01 stonithd[4754]:   notice: initiate_remote_stonith_op: Initiating remote operation off for bc1hs22a02: 48b69f82-29ad-4c9a-af57-0e60ae5242e4 (0)
>>>> Jul 30 18:41:41 bc1hs22a01 corosync[4686]:   [pcmk  ] WARN: route_ais_message: Sending message to local.stonith-ng failed: ipc delivery failed (rc=-2)
>>> rc=-2 is coming from send_client_ipc(void *conn, const AIS_Message * ais_msg)
>>> 
>>> specifically:
>>> 
>>>   if (conn == NULL) {
>>>       rc = -2;
>>> 
>>> So the plugin thinks that stonith-ng isn't connected.
>>> More logs?
>>> 
>> 
>> I have completed a full restart of the cluster in order to provide the logs at each step; see attached log files:
>> (from node_1/DC)
>> - node_1-corosync-start.log
>> - node_1-pacemaker-start.log
>> - node_1-corosync-node_2_join.log
>> - node_1-pacemaker-node_2_join.log
>> (from node_2)
>> - node_2-corosync-start.log
>> - node_2-pacemaker-start.log
>> 
>> The problem manifests itself already in DC start log - because of previous fencing attempt - at 08:19:21 and 08:19:42:
>> 
>> root at bc1hs22a01:~ # fgrep 'ipc delivery failed' node_1-corosync-start.log
>> Jul 31 08:19:21 bc1hs22a01 corosync[31057]:   [pcmk  ] WARN: route_ais_message: Sending message to local.stonith-ng failed: ipc delivery failed (rc=-2)
>> Jul 31 08:19:42 bc1hs22a01 corosync[31057]:   [pcmk  ] WARN: route_ais_message: Sending message to local.stonith-ng failed: ipc delivery failed (rc=-2)
>> 
>> While it would seem (to me) that the stonith plugin successfully connected to the CIB:
> 
> Its not the CIB thats the issue:
> 
>>>> Jul 30 18:41:41 bc1hs22a01 corosync[4686]:   [pcmk  ] WARN: route_ais_message: Sending message to local.stonith-ng failed: ipc delivery failed (rc=-2)
> 
> Thats the pacemaker plugin inside corosync (which uses a completely different IPC mechanism).

It looks like there is a name mismatch:

Jul 31 08:19:20 bc1hs22a01 corosync[31057]:   [pcmk  ] info: pcmk_ipc: Recorded connection 0x2543e30 for stonithd/0
Jul 31 08:19:20 bc1hs22a01 corosync[31057]:   [pcmk  ] debug: process_ais_message: Msg[1] (dest=local:ais, from=bc1hs22a01:stonithd.31092, remote=true, size=6): 31092
...
Jul 31 08:19:21 bc1hs22a01 corosync[31057]:   [pcmk  ] WARN: route_ais_message: Sending message to local.stonith-ng failed: ipc delivery failed (rc=-2)
Jul 31 08:19:42 bc1hs22a01 corosync[31057]:   [pcmk  ] WARN: route_ais_message: Sending message to local.stonith-ng failed: ipc delivery failed (rc=-2)

Could you try the following patch?

diff --git a/lib/ais/plugin.c b/lib/ais/plugin.c
index 3d4f369..560e18b 100644
--- a/lib/ais/plugin.c
+++ b/lib/ais/plugin.c
@@ -1508,6 +1508,9 @@ route_ais_message(const AIS_Message * msg, gboolean local_origin)
             /* te messages are routed via the crm */
             dest = crm_msg_crmd;
 
+        } else if (dest == crm_msg_stonith_ng) {
+            dest = crm_msg_stonithd;
+
         } else if (dest >= SIZEOF(pcmk_children)) {
             /* Transient client */
 




> 
> FWIW, the plugin is extremely deprecated, you're encouraged to use pacemaker+cman or begin working towards corosync2 + pacemakerd.
> 
>> 
>> root at bc1hs22a01:~ # fgrep cib_native_signon_raw node_1-pacemaker-start.log
>> Jul 31 08:19:20 [31096] bc1hs22a01       crmd:    debug: cib_native_signon_raw:     Connection unsuccessful (0 (nil))
>> Jul 31 08:19:20 [31096] bc1hs22a01       crmd:    debug: cib_native_signon_raw:     Connection to CIB failed: Transport endpoint is not connected
>> Jul 31 08:19:20 [31092] bc1hs22a01   stonithd:    debug: cib_native_signon_raw:     Connection unsuccessful (0 (nil))
>> Jul 31 08:19:20 [31092] bc1hs22a01   stonithd:    debug: cib_native_signon_raw:     Connection to CIB failed: Transport endpoint is not connected
>> Jul 31 08:19:21 [31096] bc1hs22a01       crmd:    debug: cib_native_signon_raw:     Connection to CIB successful
>> Jul 31 08:19:21 [31092] bc1hs22a01   stonithd:    debug: cib_native_signon_raw:     Connection to CIB successful
>> Jul 31 08:19:25 [31094] bc1hs22a01      attrd:    debug: cib_native_signon_raw:     Connection to CIB successful
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Cédric
>> 
>> <node_1-corosync-start.log><node_1-pacemaker-start.log><node_1-corosync-node_2_join.log><node_1-pacemaker-node_2_join.log><node_2-corosync-start.log><node_2-pacemaker-start.log>_______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> 
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20140801/4e9fc2bb/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list