[Pacemaker] N+1 and equal priority resource groups

Igal Baevsky ibaevsky at marketfactory.com
Tue Apr 22 11:46:59 EDT 2014

Andrew Beekhof <andrew at ...> writes:

> Correct. 
> Given colocate(A, B, -inf), in order to find out where A can go, we need 
to know where B is (going to go).
> Even if we made it so that was no longer the case (which at a stretch 
might even be possible after all these
> years), there is still an implicit ordering from their order in the 
> Unfortunately the human brain is still significantly more intelligent than 
> What seems obvious to us is not at all obvious to it.
> Can all three groups run on all nodes?  Or just its own and the shared 

Ideally, I would want all three groups to be able to run on all nodes based 
on pre-assigned priorities(nodes might have different hardware specs).
What I want to prevent though, is a situation where one group is being shut 
down or moved to make space for another group. This is exactly what's 
happening now when all nodes are taken.

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list