[Pacemaker] monitor on disabled nodes

Radoslaw Garbacz radoslaw.garbacz at xtremedatainc.com
Wed Sep 18 17:32:21 UTC 2013


Hi,

Seems like 'ocf_is_probe' is the right call in my case.


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.com> wrote:

> On 2013-09-18T11:13:46, Radoslaw Garbacz <
> radoslaw.garbacz at xtremedatainc.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question regarding the "monitor" operation on disabled nodes.
> >
> > I noticed that this operation is called even, when an agent is disabled
> for
> > a node. Is it an indented behavior or is there something wrong with my
> > configuration?
>
> Can you define "agent is disabled for a node"? I don't know how to do
> that in pacemaker, so I have no idea what you mean.
>
> > Another question is, if it is intended, whether there is any way to
> > distinguish such a call from a normal health check of a running agent
> (like
> > "ocf_is_probe" for "validate-all" operation)?
>
> So you're not asking about the probe, but some other time? Do you mean
> the role="Stopped" one? I'm missing a few details; what is happening,
> what is your configuration?
>
>
> Regards,
>     Lars
>
> --
> Architect Storage/HA
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix
> Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Radoslaw Garbacz
XtremeData Incorporation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20130918/3e26de3d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list