[Pacemaker] Question about the resource to fence a node

Lars Marowsky-Bree lmb at suse.com
Tue Oct 15 10:40:04 UTC 2013


On 2013-10-15T18:24:46, Kazunori INOUE <kazunori.inoue3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oct 15 15:17:16 vm2 stonith-ng[9160]:  warning: log_operation: f1:9273
> [ Performing: stonith -t external/libvirt -T reset vm3 ]
> Oct 15 15:17:46 vm2 stonith-ng[9160]:  warning: log_operation: f1:9588
> [ Performing: stonith -t external/libvirt -T reset vm3 ]
> 
> Is it specifications?

Apparently, yes.

The "stonith resource" no longer signifies the node which will perform
the fence request, just the node where the monitor for the STONITH
device will be run.

I have opinions on this change (I liked the old behaviour much better),
but it's apparently intentional.


Regards,
    Lars

-- 
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde





More information about the Pacemaker mailing list