[Pacemaker] crm subshell 1.2.4 incompatible to pacemaker 1.1.9?

Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenberg at linbit.com
Wed May 15 15:31:26 EDT 2013


On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:34:14PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:03:59PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:59:50PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 01:53:11PM +0200, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > crm tells me it is version 1.2.4
> > > > pacemaker tell me it is verison 1.1.9
> > > > 
> > > > So it should work since incompatibilities are resolved in crm higher that 
> > > > version 1.2.1. Anywas crm tells me nonsense:
> > > > 
> > > > # crm
> > > > crm(live)# node
> > > > crm(live)node# standby node1
> > > > ERROR: bad lifetime: node1
> > > 
> > > Your node is not named node1.
> > > check: crm node list
> > > 
> > > Maybe a typo, maybe some case-is-significant nonsense,
> > > maybe you just forgot to use the fqdn.
> > > maybe the check for "is this a known node name" is (now) broken?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > standby with just one argument checks if that argument
> > > happens to be a known node name,
> > > and assumes that if it is not,
> > > it "has to be" a lifetime,
> > > and the current node is used as node name...
> > > 
> > > Maybe we should invert that logic, and instead compare the single
> > > argument against allowed lifetime values (reboot, forever), and assume
> > > it is supposed to be a node name otherwise?
> > > 
> > > Then the error would become
> > > ERROR: unknown node name: node1
> > > 
> > > Which is probably more useful most of the time.
> > > 
> > > Dejan?
> > 
> > Something like this maybe:
> > 
> > diff --git a/modules/ui.py.in b/modules/ui.py.in
> > --- a/modules/ui.py.in
> > +++ b/modules/ui.py.in
> > @@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ class NodeMgmt(UserInterface):
> >          if not args:
> >              node = vars.this_node
> >          if len(args) == 1:
> > -            if not args[0] in listnodes():
> > +            if args[0] in ("reboot", "forever"):
> 
> Yes, I wanted to look at it again. Another complication is that
> the lifetime can be just about anything in that date ISO format.

That may well be, but right now those would be rejected by crmsh
anyways:

        if lifetime not in (None,"reboot","forever"):
	            common_err("bad lifetime: %s" % lifetime)
		                return False

-- 
: Lars Ellenberg
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list