[Pacemaker] Correct order of meta/params in crm

David Coulson david at davidcoulson.net
Sun Mar 3 12:29:55 EST 2013

On 3/2/13 8:22 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Unless it annoys you, this is actually harmless.
> Otherwise, params first is what I tend to use.
> Regards,
>      Lars
We've seen instances where failure-timeout is set, but Pacemaker never 
seems to clean up the failure. First thought was it didn't actually 
utilize the meta failure-timeout parameter if it was in the wrong place. 
Probably need to troubleshoot it further and try to reproduce the issue.


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list