[Pacemaker] Dependency Trees

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Donald Stahl <don at blacksun.org> wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure the latter doesn't do anything (bad choice of defaults
>> by the crmsh) because the set isn't colocated with anything.
> It sets sequential=false for the items in that set and it definitely
> behaves differently when I use it.
>
> Without the ()'s if I stop the second service- the first one also
> stops, and if I stop the first service- the second is unaffected.

Good so far.

> With
> the ()'s I can stop either service without it affecting the other,

yep

> but
> I can't bring them up on different hosts.

That part I find surprising.

>
> At least- unless I screwed up one of my test cases.
>
> -Don
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org