[Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Jiaju Zhang jjzhang at suse.de
Sun Feb 17 23:24:45 EST 2013


On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 11:36 +0800, Jiaju Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:36 +0900, yusuke iida wrote:
> > Hi, Jiaju
> > 
> > Thank you for reply!
> > 
> > 2013/2/12 Jiaju Zhang <jjzhang at suse.de>:
> > > Hi Yusuke,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:08 +0900, yusuke iida wrote:
> > >> Hi, Jiaju
> > >>
> > >> Could you please reply to this message?
> > >
> > > My suggestion is no need to add additional configuration options, in
> > > this case, the behavior of booth is definitive, return a negative value
> > > in lease_promise.
> > 
> > I understood it.
> > According to your suggestion, I cancel the additional setting option.
> > I change the judgment of current lease_promise to the form according
> > to "master lease".
> > 
> > When this logic is taken in, "hdr->leased = 1" thinks that processing
> > of lease_is_prepare becomes unnecessary since it will not be
> > transmitted.
> 
> Yes, actually it would be necessary.

Sorry for the typo, it is _unnecessary_.

Thanks,
Jiaju

> 
> > Is this processing still required?
> 
> The processing of judging hdr->leased in is_prepared function is not
> required any more, but I'd like to keep the is_prepared callback there,
> in case we need it in the future.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jiaju
> 






More information about the Pacemaker mailing list