[Pacemaker] How to make a redundant structure of arbitrator?

Gao,Yan ygao at suse.com
Mon Mar 26 23:40:48 EDT 2012

On 03/27/12 10:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jiaju Zhang <jjzhang at suse.de> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:50 +0900, Yuichi Seino wrote:
>>> Hi Jiaju,
>>> I have a question about booth.
>>> I would like to know if a redundant structure of arbitrator is possible.
>>> If it is possible, Please tell me how to the approach.
>> If I understand the question correctly, you mean that the arbitrator
>> should be redundant in case it might be down. Well, this can be resolved
>> by adding more arbitrators, for example, you have 2 sites, and configure
>> 3 arbitrators.
> The arbitrator is already redundant isn't it?
> Because you need a cluster node to fail before an arbitrator failure
> has any ill-effect.
I think the term "arbitrator" that Jiaju referred to is the booth daemon
running on a single machine, which is added to make sure the amount of
booth daemons are uneven number.

Gao,Yan <ygao at suse.com>
Software Engineer
China Server Team, SUSE.

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list