[Pacemaker] syslog full of redundand link messages

Andreas Kurz andreas at hastexo.com
Mon Jan 9 11:01:53 EST 2012


Hello,

On 01/09/2012 04:43 PM, Attila Megyeri wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks Florian, Dan.
> 
> Yes, there was a mistake, I changed the bindaddress to 10.100.1.0 - but it wasn't an issue as the subnet is /8 for some other reasons.
> 
> Anyway those errors are still coming once a second, but not on every node.
> Any indication where I should start troubleshooting? When are these logs created, what is causing this behaviour? Some communication issue?
> 
> Jan  9 15:42:00 oaweb2 corosync[27723]:   [TOTEM ] received message requesting test of ring now active
> Jan  9 15:42:01 oaweb2 corosync[27723]:   [TOTEM ] received message requesting test of ring now active
> Jan  9 15:42:02 oaweb2 corosync[27723]:   [TOTEM ] received message requesting test of ring now active
> Jan  9 15:42:03 oaweb2 corosync[27723]:   [TOTEM ] received message requesting test of ring now active

looks like debug level logging for corosync is enabled, these logs are
from the one second check intervals for the automatic redundant ring
recovery feature.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
Need help with Pacemaker?
http://www.hastexo.com/now


> 
> Thanks
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Haas [mailto:florian at hastexo.com] 
> Sent: 2012. január 9. 15:28
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] syslog full of redundand link messages
> 
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Attila Megyeri <amegyeri at minerva-soft.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I might be taking something wrong, but,
>>
>> bindnetaddr: 10.100.1.255
>>
>> does not mean it will listen on this address, but will listen on every interface where this mask matches.
>> This is just to make the config file simpler and common for all nodes in the same subnet.
>>
>> Or am I taking something terribly wrong?
> 
> As Dan states, what you configured looks more like a broadcast address, not a network address. Assuming your boxes have IP addresses of 10.100.1.x in a /24 subnet, the correct network address would be 10.100.1.0.
> 
> ipcalc is your friend, btw.
> 
> Cheers,
> Florian
> 
> --
> Need help with High Availability?
> http://www.hastexo.com/now
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 286 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20120109/8e244f69/attachment-0003.sig>


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list