[Pacemaker] DRBD, Fedora, and systemd (tangent off of Re: Upstart resources)

Major Hayden major at mhtx.net
Fri Feb 24 09:11:54 EST 2012

On Feb 24, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Florian Haas wrote:

> On 02/23/12 23:48, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Ante Karamatic <ivoks at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>> On 23.02.2012 00:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>> Do you still have LSB scripts on a machine thats using upstart?
>>> Yes, some LSB scripts can't be easily converted to upstart jobs. Or,
>>> let's rephrase that - can't be converted to upstart jobs without losing
>>> some of the functionality.
>>>> On fedora they purged them all.
>>> All? Even the stuff like drbd? I have to take a look at that.
>> I think any package that doesn't have a unit file is going to be
>> blacklisted from F-17.
>> That was the threat at least.
> In a Pacemaker cluster, nothing needs to touch DRBD during the system
> boot sequence. Nothing should, really. So the absence of any bootup
> script in a DRBD package should hardly be a reason to zap it from the
> distro.
> I'm CC'ing the Fedora DRBD package maintainer so he's at least informed
> of this thread, as I'm unsure if he follows the Pacemaker list on a
> regular basis. Hi Major. :)
> Cheers,
> Florian

Thanks for the reminder!  Converting the DRBD init scripts in Fedora 17's DRBD package is on my list of to-do's.  I'm still a little green when it comes to writing systemd startup scripts.

Major Hayden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20120224/9f15257c/attachment-0003.sig>

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list