[Pacemaker] Enable remote monitoring

Lars Marowsky-Bree lmb at suse.com
Fri Dec 7 11:24:04 UTC 2012


On 2012-12-07T15:09:09, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> >> Ordering: absolutely
> > Would any user not like the implied order? Instead want an asymmetrical
> > or some curious one?
> Conceptually it doesn't make any sense IMHO.
> By definition things cant be in/on the container if the container
> doesn't exist yet.

Agreed. They might want to specify *additional* ordering, but this one
appears always implicit.


-- 
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde





More information about the Pacemaker mailing list