[Pacemaker] minimizing cluster-glue dependencies

Pádraig Brady P at draigBrady.com
Thu Sep 8 03:58:08 EDT 2011

On 09/08/2011 01:18 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Sorry, but there's just no way anything like this is going to be
> accepted in fedora, rhel or upstream.
> If the packaging of cluster-glue-libs is too granular, the correct
> approach is to create additional subpackages - not to copy half of the
> project into pacemaker.

OK thanks Andrew.
Yes I agree that's a better approach.
At least the proof of concept SRPM helps define
where this split might be made.


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list