[Pacemaker] Syntax highlighting in vim for crm configure edit

[Patrick H.]

Sent: Mon Nov 21 2011 13:27:02 GMT-0700 (MST)
From: Trevor Hemsley <themsley at voiceflex.com>
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Syntax highlighting in vim for crm configure edit
> Patrick H. wrote:
>> Sent: Tue Nov 15 2011 02:47:59 GMT-0700 (MST)
>> From: Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] <r.bhatia at ipax.at>
>> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager 
>> <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Syntax highlighting in vim for crm configure 
>> edit
>>> hi!
>>>
>>> On 2011-08-19 16:28, Dan Frincu wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Digimer<linux at alteeve.com>  wrote:
>>>>> On 08/18/2011 10:39 AM, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have attached a first stab at a vim syntax highlighting file 
>>>>>> for 'crm
>>>>>> configure edit'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To activate this, I have added 'filetype plugin on' to my 
>>>>>> /root/.vimrc
>>>>>> then created /root/.vim/{ftdetect,ftplugin}/pcmk.vim
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In /root/.vim/ftdetect/pcmk.vim I have the following content
>>>>>>
>>>>>> au BufNewFile,BufRead /tmp/tmp* set filetype=pcmk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but there may be a better way to make this happen. 
>>>>>> /root/.vim/pcmk.vim
>>>>>> is the attached file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comments (not too nasty please!) welcome.
>>>>
>>>> I've added a couple of extra keywords to the file, to cover a couple
>>>> more use cases. Other than that, great job.
>>>
>>> will this addition make it into some package(s)?
>>> would it be right to ship this vim syntax file with crm?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> raoul
>>
>> Gave this syntax file a shot and I dont think it should be included 
>> in the standard package. Its very colorful, but it breaks too many 
>> standard highlighting conventions.
>>
>>     * The 'node' keyword doesnt gets highligted with a different color
>>       than 'primitive', 'property', etc
>>     * The names of primitives, clones, etc should be highlighed with
>>       "Identifier" not "Type"
>>     * The primitive type (ocf:hearbeat:whatever) should be "Normal"
>>     * Chars like '=' '\' ':' should not be assigned a color ("Normal"
>>       or left alone)
>>     * Colors of weights are assigned different colors when used in
>>       location rules and colocation/order rules. These should get the
>>       same color policy, and should also be something other than 
>> "String".
>>
>> The color output you get from 'configure show' should be what vim 
>> looks like, or very close to it.
> You are welcome to amend it as you see fit and submit your version to 
> the list!
>
> From my POV, 'colorful' is better than black and white which is the 
> current alternative.
I would, but I suck at vim syntax files. I have manipulated it into 
something a bit more standard, but its not the right way to do it. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20111121/99497aff/attachment.htm>