[Pacemaker] [Problem]post_notify_start_0 is carried out in the node that disappeared.

[renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp]

Hi Andrew,

Thank you for comment. 

> > If you need detailed information, give me communication.
> 
> Should be enough in the bug, i'll follow up there

All right.

Thanks!

Hideo Yamauchi.

--- On Tue, 2011/2/15, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Thank you for comment.
> >
> >> Perhaps I misunderstood - does the node fail _while_ we're running post_notify_start_0?
> >> Is that the ordering you're talking about?
> >
> > Yes.
> > I think that stonith do not have to wait for post_notify_start_0 of the inoperative node.
> >
> >> If so, then the crmd is already supposed to be smart enough not to bother waiting for those actions - perhaps the logic got broken at some point.
> >
> > If you need detailed information, give me communication.
> 
> Should be enough in the bug, i'll follow up there
>