[Pacemaker] First confused (then enlightened ? :)

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Feb 14 06:28:35 EST 2011


On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Dan Frincu <df.cluster at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron at huapi.ba.ar>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I'm trying to understand how to best implement a HA EE service.
>> > Searching for linux + HA induced me to go linux-HA way (heartbeat?)
>> > and that showed the path to pacemaker, and that open the way to corosync
>> > and OpenAIS. No news for you I guess.
>> >
>> > Is there a searchable repository of the list content so I may find
>> > if some of my doubts are already explained ?
>> >
>> > I have otherwise some specific questions:
>> >
>> > -Is still the case that Heartbeat is not to be considered for new
>> > deployments ? (I read something along that line)
>>
>> pretty much
>>
>>
>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/FAQ#Should_I_Run_Pacemaker_on_Heartbeat_or_Coroysnc.3F
>>
>> > -All IBM docs (RedBooks) point to Heartbeat. Is that because they are
>> > old ?
>>
>> yes
>
> They may be old, but they're catching up =>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/cloud/library/cl-highavailabilitycloud/

True, I forgot about that one.
At least they've started using the shell :-)




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list