[Pacemaker] A question and demand to a resource placement strategy function

Yan Gao ygao at novell.com
Wed Apr 27 05:14:04 UTC 2011


Hi Vladislav,

On 04/27/11 12:49, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi Yan,
> 
> 27.04.2011 07:32, Yan Gao wrote:
>> Hi Yuusuke,
>>
>> On 04/19/11 19:55, Yan Gao wrote:
>>> Actually I've been optimizing the placement-strategy lately. It will
>>> sort the resource processing order according to the priorities and
>>> scores of resources. That should result in ideal placement. Stay tuned.
>> The improvement of the placement strategy has been committed into the
>> devel branch. Please give it a test. Thanks!
> 
> Do priorities work for "utilization" strategy?
Yes, the improvement works for "utilization", "minimal" and "balanced"
strategy:

- The nodes that are more healthy and have more capacities get consumed
first (globally preferred nodes).

- The resources that have higher priorities and have higher scores on
globally preferred nodes get assigned first.

Regards,
  Yan
-- 
Yan Gao <ygao at novell.com>
Software Engineer
China Server Team, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list