[Pacemaker] [PATCH]Bug 2567 - crm resource migrate should support an optional "role" parameter

Holger Teutsch holger.teutsch at web.de
Wed Apr 6 15:48:15 UTC 2011


On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:38 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > > Ah, right, sorry, wanted to ask about the difference between
> > > move-off and move. The description looks the same as for move. Is
> > > it that in this case it is for clones so crm_resource needs an
> > > extra node parameter? You wrote in the doc:
> > >
> > >        +Migrate a resource (-instance for clones/masters) off the specified node.
> > >
> > > The '-instance' looks somewhat funny. Why not say "Move/migrate a
> > > clone or master/slave instance away from the specified node"?
> > >
> > > I must say that I still find all this quite confusing, i.e. now
> > > we have "move", "unmove", and "move-off", but it's probably just me :)
> > 
> > Not just you.  The problem is that we didn't fully understand all the
> > use case permutations at the time.
> > 
> > I think, not withstanding legacy computability, "move" should probably
> > be renamed to "move-to" and this new option be called "move-from".
> > That seems more obvious and syntactically consistent with the rest of
> > the system.
> 
> Yes, move-to and move-from seem more consistent than other
> options. The problem is that the old "move" is at times one and
> then at times another.
> 
> > In the absence of a host name, each uses the current location for the
> > named group/primitive resource and complains for clones.
> > 
> > The biggest question in my mind is what to call "unmove"...
> > "move-cleanup" perhaps?
> 
> move-remove? :D
> Actually, though the word is a bit awkward, unmove sounds fine
> to me.

I would vote for "move-cleanup". It's consistent to move-XXX and to my
(german) ears "unmove" seems to stand for the previous "move" being
undone and the stuff comes back.

BTW: Has someone already tried out the code or do you trust me 8-D ?

Stay tuned for updated patches...

- holger
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dejan
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> > 
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker






More information about the Pacemaker mailing list