[Pacemaker] is recovery from link failure now automatic?

Juha Heinanen jh at tutpro.com
Tue Oct 19 13:28:51 UTC 2010


Dan Frincu writes:

> You can take a look at the following and see if it helps
> 
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/pipermail/linux-ha/2010-October/041473.html

if i understood correctly, conclusion from the thread is

  Active/active rings seem to work well enough - but they do not recover
  without manual intervention.

i'll check again one year from now if corosync then would not require
manual babysitting, which in my opinion should not be a component of
a "high availability" solution.

-- juha




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list