[Pacemaker] colocation that doesn't

Alan Jones falancluster at gmail.com
Mon Nov 29 18:11:09 EST 2010

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Tim Serong <tserong at novell.com> wrote:
> Can you elaborate on why you want this particular behaviour?  Maybe
> there's some other way to approach the problem?

I have explained the issue as clearly as I know how.  The problem is fundamental
to the design of the policy engine in Pacemaker.  It performs only two passes to
resolve constraints, when what is required for general purpose
constraint resolution
is an iterative model.  These problems have been addressed in the literature for

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list