[Pacemaker] Active / Active pacemaker configuration advice

[Michael Schwartzkopff]

On Thursday 25 November 2010 08:56:21 Marko Potocnik wrote:
(...)
> The order constraint does not affect the IP migration strategy in case of
> service failure. I agree that I missed it, but I does not affect the
> current behavior of IP resource in case of service failure.


Perhaps it is better if you describe what you want to acchieve so we could 
help with the solution:

- You want to have a service running on two nodes so tha failover happens 
faster.

- In case of one failure of the service on one node you want the IP address to 
move to the other node.

Is that all?

-- 
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
Guardinistr. 63
81375 München

Tel: (0163) 172 50 98
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20101125/cc267c71/attachment-0003.sig>