[Pacemaker] Pacemaker-1.1.4, when?

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Nov 9 08:47:01 UTC 2010


On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Pavlos Parissis
<pavlos.parissis at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 October 2010 12:23, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Pavlos Parissis
>> <pavlos.parissis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 29 October 2010 11:47, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>> [...snip..]
>>>>>> There wont be unfortunately.
>>>>>> Some of the changes we needed to make involved the use of
>>>>>> g_hash_table_get_values() which only appeared in glib 2.14
>>>>>> So EPEL5 is stuck on the 1.0 series.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that mean I shouldn't use 1.1.x (x<4) on EPEL? I guess not since
>>>>> the change you mentioned is only in 1.1.4
>>>>> I currently use 1.1.3 on EPEL 5.4
>>>>
>>>> 1.1.3 is generally ok still, it was mostly performance stuff that went into .4
>>>> You could update glib manually and rebuild the 1.1.4 packages though...
>>>
>>> I wont go down this path. So, for EPEL 1.1.3 is the last available
>>> release without any upgrade paths,
>>
>> to be fair, there is an upgrade path, it just involves a version of
>> glib2 that was released less than 4 years ago
>>
>>> that's not very nice for production
>>> systems. I consider switching back to 1.0.9, which hopefully gets
>>> updated.
>>
>> 1.0.10 is almost done
>>
>>
> Initially, I moved to 1.1.3 in order to see if it solves bug #2500,
> which is not solved, and stayed on 1.1.3, even I am using
> pacemaker-1.0 schema, because I wanted to use the latest/greatest and
> get regular updates.
>
> Since there is no realistic upgrade path to 1.1.4 on EPEL, I am
> wondering if there any benefit of staying on 1.1.3 compared to using
> 1.0.10.

Its already out :-)
Plus the ordering code is much improved.

It seems however, that there is more interest in running 1.1 on EPEL5
than I previously realized.
We're going to try and figure out how to make it happen for 1.1.5

>
>
> Andrew, thanks for the clarifications, very much appreciated.
> Pavlos
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list