[Pacemaker] [PATCH] Medium: build: require Net-SNMP 5.3 or later

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Fri Mar 19 14:39:07 UTC 2010


On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Florian Haas <florian.haas at linbit.com> wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 10:02 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm at fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
>>>> Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> now that Pacemaker has been on a bi-monthly release schedule for a
>>>> while, is there any chance you could consider publishing RCs before the
>>>> actual releases, at least for the stable-1.0 branch?
>>> Good idea. That would give others a chance to give the RC a try
>>> and report any problems before the final release.
>>
>> I use the following for the pacemaker rpms I'm using at any given time:
>>    http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/testing/
>>
>> They're for 64-bit F-12 but you can rebuild them for whatever platform you like
>> I've no intention of building them for other platforms, I'd spend my
>> entire life building packages instead of getting any work done.
>>
>> Just be sure to refresh the metadata regularly, burning through
>> release numbers and disk space isn't the goal here.
>
> Who said you should build RC _packages_?
>
> Tag an RC, upload a tarball, announce on mailing list, done. How is that
> extra work?
>
> No wait, Pacemaker builds directly from a Mercurial tarball. So scratch
> the upload part.

What does the tag achieve apart from ensuring people waste their time
testing versions that don't have any fixes since it was created?




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list