[Pacemaker] Does this config make sense? (OpenVZ, DRBD, Corosync, Pacemaker, OCFS2) Active/Active/Pasive

[marc genou]

I am testing some configs and I am not really sure if this goal can be
achieved.

As main target I would like to deploy a HA containers (OpenVZ) system which
should be able to run this containers, performing failover in a transparent
way for the final admin/user of this container.
I mean, not to be noticed about a failed container and be able to keep
working transparently on the "second" active.

Is this possible?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20100617/e702965d/attachment.html>