[Pacemaker] [PATCH]Omitted STONITH of useless broadcast.(only 2 nodes configuration)

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Jul 6 09:24:43 UTC 2010


2010/7/6  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>:
> Hi All,
>
> I wrote a patch.
>
> This patch limited it to two node configuration and wrote it.
> When failed in STONITH by the configuration of two nodes, the request of STONITH to the other node is
> useless.
>
> Because the reason is because it can carry out STONITH only from one node.
> We should omit the request of STONITH of Broadcast.
>
> It is not necessary to wait for time-out of broadcast of STONITH by omitting it.
>
>  * We use the configuration of two nodes in many cases.
>  * It is very effective to omit STONITH of useless broadcast.

stonithd should also have access to the memebership list, so i dont
think clients like the crmd need to be involved here.

>
> I am confirming the movement of this patch now.
> Please tell me an opinion of all of you.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
>




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list