[Pacemaker] unexpected quorum votes in new debian packages

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Mon Feb 8 10:02:10 UTC 2010


On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:35:41AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff <misch at multinet.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried on amd64 and had no problems. Same setup:
> > plain debian on virtual box with
> > apt-get install pacemaker
> >
> > from people.debian.org/~madkiss/ha
> >
> > only the i386 compile has the problems. Very strange...
> 
> Actually this is good news.
> It means there is some sort of issue with the build environment, not the code.
> 
> I suspect (at a minimum) the value of U64T is being miscalculated or
> (incorrectly) cached.

Perhaps rebuilding in pbuilder would be a good start.
Though you may need some of the build patches that I posted
the other day in order to successfully build.

I did my work on amd64. I would be interested
to hear of any i386 build/lintian problems you come across
if you do end up rebuilding.





More information about the Pacemaker mailing list