[Pacemaker] About specifications of on-fail="block".

renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
Thu Aug 26 21:10:17 EDT 2010


Hi Andrew, 

I registered this problem on Bugzilla.

 * http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2476

Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.


--- renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I compared movement in a version of pacemaker about this problem.
> 
>  * 1.0.9-74392a28b7f31d7ddc86689598bd23114f58978b
> 
> [root at srv02 ~]# crm_mon -1 
> ============
> Last updated: Fri Aug 13 13:02:24 2010
> Stack: openais
> Current DC: srv01 - partition with quorum
> Version: 1.0.9-74392a28b7f31d7ddc86689598bd23114f58978b
> 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
> 1 Resources configured.
> ============
> 
> Online: [ srv01 srv02 ]
> 
>  Resource Group: UMgroup01
>      UmVIPcheck (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv02
>      UmIPaddr   (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy2):        Started srv01 (unmanaged) FAILED
> 
> Failed actions:
>     UmIPaddr_stop_0 (node=srv01, call=9, rc=1, status=complete): unknown error
> 
>  * 1.0.8-94bf2cc9219b11310f7d3e310f3623bf85e20bf9
> 
> [root at srv01 ~]# crm_mon -1 
> ============
> Last updated: Fri Aug 13 12:47:08 2010
> Stack: openais
> Current DC: srv01 - partition with quorum
> Version: 1.0.8-94bf2cc9219b11310f7d3e310f3623bf85e20bf9
> 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
> 1 Resources configured.
> ============
> 
> Online: [ srv01 srv02 ]
> 
>  Resource Group: UMgroup01
>      UmVIPcheck (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv01
>      UmIPaddr   (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy2):        Started srv01 (unmanaged) FAILED
> 
> Failed actions:
>     UmIPaddr_stop_0 (node=srv01, call=7, rc=1, status=complete): unknown error
> 
> 
> In the old version, on-fail=block seems to work definitely somehow or other.
> 
> The next change influences the difference of the movement.
> 
>  * http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/6bf91e9195fe
> 
> Is this revision right?
> 
> I do not understand contents of the bugs(lf#1959) well, but wish on-fail=block works in the same
> way
> as the past.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
> 
> 
> 
> --- renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Let me confirm it about specifications of on-fail="block".
> > 
> > 
> > I constituted the following cluster.
> > 
> > ============
> > Last updated: Mon Aug  9 11:18:29 2010
> > Stack: openais
> > Current DC: srv01 - partition with quorum
> > Version: 1.0.9-74392a28b7f31d7ddc86689598bd23114f58978b
> > 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
> > 1 Resources configured.
> > ============
> > 
> > Online: [ srv01 srv02 ]
> > 
> >  Resource Group: UMgroup01
> >      UmVIPcheck (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv01
> >      UmIPaddr   (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy2):        Started srv01
> > 
> > 
> > The error of the UmIPaddr resource of this time set it in block.。
> > 
> >       <group id="UMgroup01">
> >         <primitive class="ocf" type="Dummy" provider="heartbeat" id="UmVIPcheck">
> >           <operations>
> >             <op id="op-umVIPcheck-start" interval="0" name="start" timeout="90s"
> > on-fail="restart"
> > start-delay="2s"/>
> >           </operations>
> >         </primitive>
> >         <primitive class="ocf" type="Dummy2" provider="heartbeat" id="UmIPaddr">
> >           <operations>
> >             <op id="op-umIPaddr-start" interval="0" name="start" timeout="60s"
> > on-fail="restart"/>
> >             <op id="op-umIPaddr-monitor" interval="10" name="monitor" timeout="60s"
> > on-fail="restart"/>
> >             <op id="op-umIPaddr-stop" interval="0" name="stop" timeout="60s" on-fail="block"/>
> >           </operations>
> >         </primitive>
> >       </group>
> > 
> > 
> > UmVIPcheck moves to a srv02 node when I generate a stop error in UmIPaddr artificially then.
> > UmIPaddr does not move.
> > 
> > 
> > ============
> > Last updated: Mon Aug  9 11:19:19 2010
> > Stack: openais
> > Current DC: srv01 - partition with quorum
> > Version: 1.0.9-74392a28b7f31d7ddc86689598bd23114f58978b
> > 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
> > 1 Resources configured.
> > ============
> > 
> > Online: [ srv01 srv02 ]
> > 
> >  Resource Group: UMgroup01
> >      UmVIPcheck (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv02
> >      UmIPaddr   (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy2):        Started srv01 (unmanaged) FAILED
> > 
> > Failed actions:
> >     UmIPaddr_stop_0 (node=srv01, call=8, rc=1, status=complete): unknown error
> > 
> > 
> > Setting of UmIPaddr acted and thought that UmVIPcheck did not move.(on-fail="block")
> > 
> > I have forgotten whether this movement was specifications.
> > 
> > Is this movement specifications?
> > Was there the setting that did not move other group resources?(not move UmVIPcheck)
> > 
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > 
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> > 
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> 





More information about the Pacemaker mailing list