[Pacemaker] [PATCH]The changing of the log level of pengine process.

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Aug 2 05:26:10 EDT 2010

2010/7/29  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>:
> Hi All,
> Our user showed a demand in a level of log output after handling of pengine.
> When STONITH is carried out, pengine wants to output log at a warning level if a repeating resource is
> only an STONITH resource.
> Because plural STONITH may be started when STONITH is carried out.
> However, it is because the importance of the problem is different from the plural start of the normal
> resource.

I'm having trouble understanding the purpose of this patch...

If the only resource on a node to be fenced is a stonith resource, and
that resource is also running on another node, then unset
"was_processing_error"... is that right?

Why do that?

> I wrote the patch which operated a was_processing_error flag to answer the demand of our user.
> This patch may be considerably special.
> I do not think that all users need this patch.
> Please talk to me an opinion for this patch.
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list