[Pacemaker] the better class plugin for a service?

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Fri Apr 16 16:01:17 UTC 2010


On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Ivan Coronado <icoronado at epcge.com> wrote:
> And why is a better choice? How I can know?

The OCF standard is better in many ways, including its support for
parameters and the error codes it returns.
The pacemaker docs include a section on each of the supported resource classes.




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list