[Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Sep 21 16:25:44 UTC 2009


On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:54 PM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>> I'm almost afraid to ask, why would someone need this capability?
>
> In the case of the environment that shifted from version 1 of Heartbeat, I think that the user may do
> how to use such respawn.

Ok, but I'm trying to understand why.
What function are these daemons performing?  Why do they need to keep
running even when the node is in standby?

>
> We talk about a substitute method again, too.
>
> Thank you.
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
> --- Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:09 AM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> >
>> >> I still don't understand why you can't simply make them regular
>> >> cluster resources.
>> >> Can you please explain?
>> >
>> > I understand your opinion.
>> > I surely understand that simple RA can operate an object of respawn by shifting.
>> >
>> > However, an object of respawn of all users cannot shift to RA.
>> > For example, there is the user who does respawn of processing to work even if a node becomes
>> the
>> > standby state.
>>
>> I'm almost afraid to ask, why would someone need this capability?
>>
>> > But, a primitive resource and the Clone resource stop when a node becomes the standby state.
>> > The user needing this respawn cannot easily shift to new environment.
>>
>> True.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list
>> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list