[Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Thu Sep 17 06:54:52 UTC 2009


On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:03 AM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We test a shift to new environment(Corosync+Pacemaker...) now.
>
> A demand was discussed by the next email.
>
> * http://marc.info/?l=openais&m=124615212603435&w=2
>
> Our many users use respawn.
> These many users feel a problem in moving the function of respawn in new environment.
> In addition, many users are not ready to shift in respawn.
>
> Support of respawn is necessary to shift to new environment.
> The support of respawn lets many hesitating users shift.
>
> We think the start by respawn to be the method that had better be realized in Pacemaker in the same
> way as GUI.
>
> Will you think about the realization of the function like respawn supported in Heartbeat in new
> environment?
>
> * I recognize that respawn is a provisional function in Heartbeat.
> * However, many users use it.

I still don't understand why you can't simply make them regular
cluster resources.
Can you please explain?




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list