[Pacemaker] System Health backend part

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Thu Jun 4 03:03:52 EDT 2009

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Mark Hamzy <hamzy at us.ibm.com> wrote:

> I believe that general purpose solutions that follow standards should
> live in pacemaker.

Just returning to this for a moment, if it is a truly general purpose
solution, then it could be useful for those not running Pacemaker.

So if we're talking about a daemon, then unless its pacemaker-specific
or needs pacemaker to compile, then it really should go in with the
other resources (we'll have some announcements regarding where
resources are kept "soon").

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list