[Pacemaker] putting a DC into standby does not change the DC

Andrew Beekhof beekhof at gmail.com
Tue Feb 10 13:04:19 EST 2009

On Feb 10, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:

> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> is this an intended behavior?
>> yes
>>> if so, can you please elaborate why?
>>> (not a priority of course).
>> let me ask a question back, why would it need to be somewhere else?
> i would not expect a node in standby to play *any* active role in the
> cluster. this, imho, applies to being a dc too.

and you didnt really answer the question.  what benefit is there to  
designating another node as DC?

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list