[Pacemaker] [PATCH]The abolition of distinguishing a node name by a small and capital letter.

Dejan Muhamedagic dejanmm at fastmail.fm
Tue Dec 15 09:33:58 EST 2009


Hi Lars,

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:24:42PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:25:41AM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi Hideo-san,
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:22:35AM +0900, renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > > Hi Dejan,
> > > 
> > > > Are node names uppercase? And then stonith doesn't work?
> > > 
> > > The node name is a small letter. 
> > 
> > Well, why would they put in uppercase names then?
> > 
> > > stonith acts, but it is not carried out because it is not found an target node.
> > > 
> > > It is caused by a mistake of the setting obviously. 
> > > However, for a user, some kind of measures are necessary.
> > 
> > Sorry, this smells like wontfix :)
> 
> Hm. let me try to summarize my understanding of this thread.
> 
> Hostnames are in general case insensitive.
> 
> In pacemaker/openais/heartbeat, in most places, this is correctly taken
> care of by using strcasecmp(3) or tolower(3) in C code where
> appropriate.

Correctly :) We have a bugzilla open for this, because it
breaks configurations with node names which contain uppercase
letters. But I doubt that that will be fixed. Basically, the only
way is to just have lowercase host names.

> some stonith plugins however seem to be case sensitive,
> and will just break when one uses hostnames with inappropriate case.
> 
> Hideo-san proposes to fix that stonith plugin,
> to make it deal with hostnames case insensitive as well
> (as the rest of the cluster stack and dns and whatever does),
> but to warn about the fact that there is some case mismatch between
> spelling in some config file and "hostlist detection" of the stonith plugin.

My understanding was that the user placed uppercase node names in
the stonith configuration, but the node names are actually
lowercase. But if your understanding is correct, then we may fix
this.

> Hideo-san,
> if my understanding of your proposal is correct,
> then I think that should just be done.
> makes the code more robust,
> follows principle of least surprise etc.
> 
> there may even be plugins that can only "autodetect" in all caps
> because of limitations in the firmware of the hardware used.
> I don't know.

Right, could be, but that should be dealt with in the plugin.

> but either folding hostnames to all lowercase,
> or using strcasecmp, sounds reasonable.

Yes, though that means changing all plugins.

Cheers,

Dejan


> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> : Lars Ellenberg
> : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
> : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com
> 
> DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list