[Pacemaker] RFC: What part of the XML configuration do you hate the most?

Andrew Beekhof beekhof at gmail.com
Tue Oct 28 06:38:40 EDT 2008

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:59, Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:45, Satomi TANIGUCHI
> <taniguchis at intellilink.co.jp> wrote:

>>> Without changing CIB, resources are moved undoubtedly but
>>> crm_mon can't show the node's status correctly.
>>> I think it should show the node is "standby".
>> And your response was
>>> I didn't notice that.  It should do.  I'll try and find some time to
>>> check today.
>> So I was waiting for you.;)
> Oh right.  I remember now.
> I think we can do this a little more simply though.
> /me takes a look

as soon as the resource is stopped, the failed action is ignored and
therefore the node is no longer in standby mode.
i think we need a general approach to this issue - since we probably
want other on-fail actions to also apply in the same scenario.

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list