[Pacemaker] Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [Cluster-devel] [RFC] Splitting cluster.git into separate projects/trees

Andrew Beekhof beekhof at gmail.com
Mon Nov 17 05:25:08 EST 2008

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:02, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:52 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:52, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com> wrote:

>> > There is actually an important difference for me to keep them separated.
>> >
>> > Each time we do a package update, the whole set of daemons will need to
>> > go through testing again, even if they didn't change a bit.
>> True.
>> Random thought - how about having the resource and fence agents together?
>> Similar things with similar update frequencies...
> hmmm no.. same reason. they have different tasks.. different subsystems
> etc.

They're still scripts though (and there's not much more difference
between an IP and IPMI script than there is between an IP and Apache
And I'd guess that the chances of each set needing a refresh is about
the same at any given point in time...

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list