[Pacemaker] Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [Cluster-devel] [RFC] Splitting cluster.git into separate projects/trees

Andrew Beekhof beekhof at gmail.com
Mon Nov 17 03:52:19 EST 2008

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:52, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 15:57 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > I'd have thought fence.git and fence-agents.git in one and cman.git
>> > and rgmanager.git in another.
>> > But I may be missing some of the interdependencies.
>> I wouldn't mind either of those combinations.  Maybe rgmanager's last
>> stand will be in cluster.git anyway... if so, then it's not a factor.
>> I didn't have much reason for separating fence/fence-agents.  We're
>> planning on unifying it all anyway, even if the agents are done sooner.
>> And I don't think packaging/releasing agents separately should have much
>> bearing on the source tree?  (I've heard interest in putting agents in
>> their own package for Fedora.)
>> Dave
> There is actually an important difference for me to keep them separated.
> Each time we do a package update, the whole set of daemons will need to
> go through testing again, even if they didn't change a bit.


Random thought - how about having the resource and fence agents together?
Similar things with similar update frequencies...

Just an idea.

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list