<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue-Light, Helvetica Neue Light, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div>Sorry, I meant Apache v2, I was mentally confusing it with GPL v3.</div><div><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1452097243273_4643" dir="ltr">The licensing concern is not actually mine, I'm just the one that was appointed to follow up on the topic. I know we can use the agents under GPL just fine (and I've already contributed back to the GitHub repo). The concern was if we ever wanted to bundle the fence-agents code with our Apache-licensed project for distribution in the future. That can't be done under GPL.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1452097243273_4642" dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1452097243273_4614" dir="ltr">Personally, I don't see it as an issue at all. There's really no need to bundle the software when the receiving party can just grab their own copy from GitHub anyway. But I was asked to look into it.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1452097243273_4641" dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Thank you all for your replies!</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">-Ollie</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1452097243273_4644" dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1452097243273_4613"><span></span></div> <div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div style="display: block;" class="yahoo_quoted"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue-Light, Helvetica Neue Light, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div dir="ltr"><font face="Arial" size="2"> On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 4:53 PM, Jan Pokorný <jpokorny@redhat.com> wrote:<br></font></div> <br><br> <div class="y_msg_container">On 05/01/16 23:18 +0000, <a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:ollie@yahoo.com" href="mailto:ollie@yahoo.com">ollie@yahoo.com</a> wrote:<div class="yqt2455359699" id="yqtfd18392"><br clear="none">> As a follow-up question, was the Apache v3 license considered</div><br clear="none"><br clear="none">Would you please provide a reference to such a license?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Quick web search suggests this is a typo, furthermore used uniformly,<br clear="none">likely a result of search&replace. If that's the case, I am curious<br clear="none">about the original desired license(s).<br clear="none"><br clear="none">(And perhaps, what's wrong with copyleft licenses while these<br clear="none">likely maximize the collective benefit without compromising<br clear="none">the basic freedoms...)<br clear="none"><br clear="none">-- <br clear="none">Jan (Poki)<br>_______________________________________________<br clear="none">Developers mailing list<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:Developers@clusterlabs.org" href="mailto:Developers@clusterlabs.org">Developers@clusterlabs.org</a><br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers" target="_blank">http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers</a><div class="yqt2455359699" id="yqtfd40901"><br clear="none"></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>