[ClusterLabs Developers] Issue in fence_ilo4 with IPv6 ILO IPs

[Rohit Saini]

Looking for some help on this.

Thanks,
Rohit

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:24 AM Rohit Saini <rohitsaini111.forum at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
> I am trying fence_ilo4 with same ILO device having IPv4 and IPv6 address.
> I see some discrepancy in both the behaviours:
>
> *1. When ILO has IPv4 address*
> This is working fine and stonith resources are started immediately.
>
> *2. When ILO has IPv6 address*
> Starting of stonith resources is taking more than 20 seconds sometime.
>
> *[root at tigana ~]# pcs status*
> Cluster name: ucc
> Stack: corosync
> Current DC: tigana (version 1.1.16-12.el7-94ff4df) - partition with quorum
> Last updated: Wed Mar 27 00:01:37 2019
> Last change: Wed Mar 27 00:01:19 2019 by root via cibadmin on orana
>
> 2 nodes configured
> 4 resources configured
>
> Online: [ orana tigana ]
>
> Full list of resources:
>
>  Master/Slave Set: unicloud-master [unicloud]
>      Masters: [ orana ]
>      Slaves: [ tigana ]
>  fence-uc-orana (stonith:fence_ilo4):   FAILED orana
>  fence-uc-tigana        (stonith:fence_ilo4):   Started orana
>
> Failed Actions:
> * fence-uc-orana_start_0 on orana 'unknown error' (1): call=32,
> status=Timed Out, exitreason='none',
>     last-rc-change='Wed Mar 27 00:01:17 2019', queued=0ms, exec=20006ms
> *<<<<<<<*
>
>
>
> *Queries:*
> 1. Why is it happening only for IPv6 ILO devices? Is this some known issue?
> 2. Can we increase the timeout period "exec=20006ms" to something else.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Rohit
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20190331/619effd4/attachment.html>