[ClusterLabs Developers] [questionnaire] Do you overload pacemaker's meta-attributes to track your own data?

Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais jgdr at dalibo.com
Thu Jun 28 17:01:02 EDT 2018

On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 20:23:29 +0200
Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> wrote:
> So now the promised questions; just send a reply where you [x] tick
> your selections for the questions below, possibly with some more
> commentary on the topic, and preferrably on-list (single of your
> choice is enough):
> 1. In your cluster configurations, do you carry meta-attributes
>    other than those recognized by pacemaker?
   [x] no
> 2. How do you feel about said meta-attributes' namespace separation
>    proposal (as summarized in documentation edit per above link)?
   [x] no feelings/not related to my use cases (e.g., haven't used
       custom meta-attributes possibility before, no inclination to
       use that in the future)

my 2¢

More information about the Developers mailing list