[ClusterLabs Developers] New challenges with corosync 3/kronosnet + pacemaker

[Digimer]

On 2018-02-09 03:27 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> there is certainly whole can of these worms, put first that crosses
> my mind: performing double (de)compression on two levels of abstraction
> in the inter-node communication is not very clever, to put it mildly.
> 
> So far, just pacemaker was doing that for itself under certain
> conditions, now corosync 3 will have it's iron in this fire through
> kronosnet, too.  Perhaps something to keep in mind to avoid
> exercises in futility.

Can pacemaker be told to not do compression? If not, can that be added
in pacemaker v2?

-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com/w/
"I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of
Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent
have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops." - Stephen Jay Gould