[ClusterLabs Developers] [booth][sbd] GPLv2.1+ clarification request

Jan Pokorný jpokorny at redhat.com
Wed Mar 30 13:00:28 EDT 2016

On 21/03/16 22:03 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 18/03/16 16:16 +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>> So I move to change it to GPLv2+, for everything that is a "program",
>> and LGPLv2.1 for everything that may be viewed as a library.
>> At least that's how I will correct the wording in the
>> affected files in the heartbeat mercurial.
> In the light of the presented historic excursion, that feels natural.
> Assuming no licensors want to speak up, the question now stands:
> Is it the same conclusion that has been reached by booth and sbd
> package maintainers (Dejan and Andrew respectively, if I follow what's
> authoritative nowadays properly) and are these willing to act on it to
> prevent the mentioned ambiguous interpretation once forever?
> I will be happy to provide actual patches, but that's not a decision
> for me to take.
> In fact, Andrew has already expressed his inclination:
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/developers/2016-March/000182.html

Here we go to address this in sbd:

Jan (Poki)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20160330/00aa18e5/attachment-0003.sig>

More information about the Developers mailing list